Guus van den Brekel presented an excellent comparison of four journal apps which the university of Groningen evaluated as a way to help academics keep up to date with their literature. How do your users want to read journals? Only in response to a concrete query, doing a database search? Or do they also browse tables of content? And how often do they do the latter – do they rather use RSS feeds from selected journals, or do they browse their favourite journals on a Friday afternoon?

All four apps come from fairly small, innovative companies, not from the big library software providers or publishers. They are:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The app that scored highest in the Groningen evaluation against a set of criteria and attracted a substantial amount of additional usage of the journals, was Browzine. I was glad to hear of this outcome: at Bern university we are currently trialling Browzine, too!