Category: Learning resources

How To Do a Systematic Review 

This is a question medical librarians are often asked by prospective authors of systematic reviews. Books on the topic are usually weak on the librariany bits – the chapter on literature searching tends to consist of a descriptive list of databases, combined with the advice to ‘ask a medical librarian’… Fortunately, some colleagues have written useful guidance on the whole process. Here is a selection of some really outstanding library websites on literature searching for systematic reviews:

Each of these sites contains a wealth of references to both further reading and training courses. Of course, the range of training materials provided by the Cochrane Collaboration should not be forgotten either.

Up north

Fränzi and I visited two medical libraries this week, both well respected amongst medical librarian colleagues, but each with its very own preferences and focus.

The library of the AMC (Academisch Medisch Centrum) in Amsterdam has to focus on resources for research, as its director, Dr. Lieuwe Kool, explained: funding does not allow licensing e-textbooks, nor the purchase of multiple print copies. On the plus side, the AMC library’s team of four information specialists offer an extensive programme of training courses and one-on-one support, especially for advanced publications like systematic reviews.

IMG_1447

The Münster Zweigbibliothek Medizin – voted Germany’s best special library by users – supports medical education better than probably any other medical library in Europe, with a substantial collection of multiple copies, e-books, apps, and even hundreds of borrowable iPads with the learning materials preinstalled. With the ‘Easyphysikum‘ project – all resources for the 1. Staatsexamen accessible on an iPad, Dr. Oliver Obst, the librarian, consolidated Münster’s role as innovative leader in medical education resources. Database training and enquiry services are available, too – and the building is comfortable, spacious, modern and well-lit.

It will be a long way until we here in Bern can compete against libraries like these…

iPads in Medical Education – Apple Experts Roundtable, Amsterdam, Dec 14th, 2015

Being librarians, we buy or license e-books. Well, some libraries are getting into publishing – through repositories or OJS journal servers. But producing e-books, and competing with textbook publishers like Elsevier and Thieme? Is that any of our business?

Yes, why not? Programs like iBooks Author – a free-to-download programme from Apple – or, as a platform for a whole university press, Open Monograph Press from the Public Knowledge Project, allow all of us to produce e-books, even with multimedia and interactive content. Jochen Bretschneider from Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre in Amsterdam showed how as part of their ‘Mobile Learning Initiative‘ he and his team turn lecture notes into ibooks and enrich them with videoed surgical procedures, interactive elements etc.

We librarians spend huge and probably unsustainable amounts of money on e-books the vast majority of which make no use of the benefits the on-line platform offers (and quite a few even come in infuriating DRM restricted formats). At the same time quite a lot of teaching materials that our academics have created in-house, are dumped in poor formats in remote corners of Virtual Learning Environments or course websites. Wouldn’t it be worth setting a small proportion of our e-book budget aside, to allow our academics to experiment with the e-book format? Some of the content might turn out more useful than the e-books we have been licensing for so many years…

Medical librarians of all nations unite!

Four Scandinavian colleagues proposed that medical librarians across EAHIL collaborate in the field of Information Skills Teaching. They had carried out a survey that clearly demonstrated wide-spread support for sharing teaching materials, but also experiences.

Interestingly, a parallel effort to establish a shared resource for librarians teaching EBM started recently on an MLA forum, and led to the creation of a resource pool (hosted by Northeast Ohio Medical University) and a – still informal – mailing list. Let’s see if these two groups will join forces!

Is the iPad the successor to the printed textbook?

Oliver Obst reported the findings from a large-scale iPad trial in Münster – a project he first mentioned at the 2013 AGMB conference in Berlin, the outcome of which many of us have been eagerly awaiting.

With the transition of journals to the on-line format completed, the Münster ZB Medizin investigated the potential of a similar conversion of student textbooks. A survey amongst students showed strong penetration of traditional (i.e. print) textbooks, complemented with on-line (multiple choice) training materials, lecture notes and on-line textbooks. Students tend to use the lecture notes in electronic format, annotating them and sharing them within their revision groups through cloud services.

The Münster library decided to build on the popularity of the tablet as a learning and revision tool, and piloted loanable, pre-loaded iPads (85 of them!) alongside content bundles for download to students’ personal iPads (70 of those). Students quickly adopted the iPad, even changing their revision habits to make best use of the new tool. The learning tools also integrate with external tools, such as communication or calendar.

So is the iPad the heir to the throne? Oliver Obst’s answer was along the lines that – although each medium was so unique there was never a 100% successor to anything -, the iPad integrates the functions of the textbook with many additional ones. A future device that expands the capabilities of the platform even further, might, indeed, replace the printed textbook for good. However, the big hurdle of making content available, in the form of site-licensed apps, will have to be overcome.